Skip to content

Consortia Academia

Group of Journals: A partner of Network of Professional Researchers and Educators (NPRE)

  • Home
  • About
    • Abstracting/Indexing
    • Editorial Team
    • Peer Review Process
    • Publication Frequency
    • Open Access Policy
    • Copyright Notice
    • Publication Ethics
    • Privacy Statement
    • Disclaimer
  • Submissions
    • Submission Process
    • Author Guidelines
    • Review Guidelines
    • Donations
  • IJRSE
    • 2012
      • 2012 IJRSE – Vol. 1 Issue 1
      • 2012 IJRSE – Vol. 1 Issue 2
    • 2013
      • 2013 IJRSE – Vol. 2 Issue 1
      • 2013 IJRSE – Vol. 2 Issue 2
      • 2013 IJRSE – Vol. 2 Issue 3
      • 2013 IJRSE – Vol. 2 Issue 4
    • 2014
      • 2014 IJRSE – Vol. 3 Issue 1
      • 2014 IJRSE – Vol. 3 Issue 2
      • 2014 IJRSE – Vol. 3 Issue 3
      • 2014 IJRSE – Vol. 3 Issue 4
      • 2014 IJRSE – Vol. 3 Issue 5
    • 2015
      • 2015 IJRSE – Vol. 4 Issue 1
      • 2015 IJRSE – Vol. 4 Issue 2
      • 2015 IJRSE – Vol. 4 Issue 3
      • 2015 IJRSE – Vol. 4 Issue 4
    • 2016
      • 2016 IJRSE – Vol. 5 Issue 1
      • 2016 IJRSE – Vol. 5 Issue 2
      • 2016 IJRSE – Vol. 5 Issue 3
      • 2016 IJRSE – Vol. 5 Issue 4
    • 2017
      • 2017 IJRSE – Vol. 6 Issue 1
      • 2017 IJRSE – Vol. 6 Issue 2
      • 2017 IJRSE – Vol. 6 Issue 3
      • 2017 IJRSE – Vol. 6 Issue 4
    • 2018
      • 2018 IJRSE – Vol. 7 Issue 1
      • 2018 IJRSE – Vol. 7 Issue 2
      • 2018 IJRSE – Vol. 7 Issue 3
      • 2018 IJRSE – Vol. 7 Issue 4
    • 2019
      • 2019 IJRSE – Vol. 8 Issue 1
      • 2019 IJRSE – Vol. 8 Issue 2
      • 2019 IJRSE – Vol. 8 Issue 3
      • 2019 IJRSE – Vol. 8 Issue 4
    • 2020
      • 2020 IJRSE – Vol. 9 Issue 1
      • 2020 IJRSE – Vol. 9 Issue 2
      • 2020 IJRSE – Vol. 9 Issue 3
      • 2020 IJRSE – Vol. 9 Issue 4
      • 2020 IJRSE – Vol. 9 Issue 5
      • 2020 IJRSE – Vol. 9 Issue 6
      • 2020 IJRSE – Vol. 9 Issue 7
      • 2020 IJRSE – Vol. 9 Issue 8
    • 2021
      • 2021 IJRSE – Vol. 10 Issue 1
      • 2021 IJRSE – Vol. 10 Issue 2
      • 2021 IJRSE – Vol. 10 Issue 3
      • 2021 IJRSE – Vol. 10 Issue 4
      • 2021 IJRSE – Vol. 10 Issue 5
      • 2021 IJRSE – Vol. 10 Issue 6
      • 2021 IJRSE – Vol. 10 Issue 7
      • 2021 IJRSE – Vol. 10 Issue 8
      • 2021 IJRSE – Vol. 10 Issue 9
      • 2021 IJRSE – Vol. 10 Issue10
      • 2021 IJRSE – Vol. 10 Issue11
      • 2021 IJRSE – Vol. 10 Issue12
      • 2021 IJRSE – Vol. 10 Issue13
      • 2021 IJRSE – Vol. 10 Issue14
      • 2021 IJRSE – Vol. 10 Issue15
      • 2021 IJRSE – Vol. 10 Issue16
    • 2022
      • 2022 IJRSE – Vol. 11 Issue 1
      • 2022 IJRSE – Vol. 11 Issue 2
      • 2022 IJRSE – Vol. 11 Issue 3
      • 2022 IJRSE – Vol. 11 Issue 4
      • 2022 IJRSE – Vol. 11 Issue 5
      • 2022 IJRSE – Vol. 11 Issue 6
      • 2022 IJRSE – Vol. 11 Issue 7
      • 2022 IJRSE – Vol. 11 Issue 8
      • 2022 IJRSE – Vol. 11 Issue 9
      • 2022 IJRSE – Vol.11 Issue 10
      • 2022 IJRSE – Vol.11 Issue 11
      • 2022 IJRSE – Vol.11 Issue 12
      • 2022 IJRSE – Vol.11 Issue 13
      • 2022 IJRSE – Vol.11 Issue 14
      • 2022 IJRSE – Vol.11 Issue 15
      • 2022 IJRSE – Vol.11 Issue 16
    • 2023
      • 2023 IJRSE – Vol.12 Issue 1
      • 2023 IJRSE – Vol.12 Issue 2
  • IJRSET
    • 2012
      • 2012 IJRSET – Vol. 1 Issue 1
      • 2012 IJRSET – Vol. 1 Issue 2
    • 2013
      • 2013 IJRSET – Vol. 2 Issue 1
      • 2013 IJRSET – Vol. 2 Issue 2
    • 2014
      • 2014 IJRSET – Vol. 3 Issue 1
      • 2014 IJRSET – Vol. 3 Issue 2
    • 2015
      • 2015 IJRSET – Vol. 4 Issue 1
      • 2015 IJRSET – Vol. 4 Issue 2
    • 2016
      • 2016 IJRSET – Vol. 5 Issue 1
      • 2016 IJRSET – Vol. 5 Issue 2
    • 2017
      • 2017 IJRSET – Vol. 6 Issue 1
      • 2017 IJRSET – Vol. 6 Issue 2
    • 2018
      • 2018 IJRSET – Vol. 7 Issue 1
  • IJRSLL
    • 2012
      • 2012 IJRSLL – Vol. 1 Issue 1
      • 2012 IJRSLL – Vol. 1 Issue 2
    • 2013
      • 2013 IJRSLL – Vol. 2 Issue 1
      • 2013 IJRSLL – Vol. 2 Issue 2
      • 2013 IJRSLL – Vol. 2 Issue 3
      • 2013 IJRSLL – Vol. 2 Issue 4
      • 2013 IJRSLL – Vol. 2 Issue 5
    • 2014
      • 2014 IJRSLL – Vol. 3 Issue 1
      • 2014 IJRSLL – Vol. 3 Issue 2
      • 2014 IJRSLL – Vol. 3 Issue 3
      • 2014 IJRSLL – Vol. 3 Issue 4
      • 2014 IJRSLL – Vol. 3 Issue 5
      • 2014 IJRSLL – Vol. 3 Issue 6
      • 2014 IJRSLL – Vol. 3 Issue 7
    • 2015
      • 2015 IJRSLL – Vol. 4 Issue 1
      • 2015 IJRSLL – Vol. 4 Issue 2
      • 2015 IJRSLL – Vol. 4 Issue 3
      • 2015 IJRSLL – Vol. 4 Issue 4
    • 2016
      • 2016 IJRSLL – Vol. 5 Issue 1
      • 2016 IJRSLL – Vol. 5 Issue 2
      • 2016 IJRSLL – Vol. 5 Issue 3
      • 2016 IJRSLL – Vol. 5 Issue 4
    • 2017
      • 2017 IJRSLL – Vol. 6 Issue 1
      • 2017 IJRSLL – Vol. 6 Issue 2
      • 2017 IJRSLL – Vol. 6 Issue 3
      • 2017 IJRSLL – Vol. 6 Issue 4
    • 2018
      • 2018 IJRSLL – Vol. 7 Issue 1
      • 2018 IJRSLL – Vol. 7 Issue 2
      • 2018 IJRSLL – Vol. 7 Issue 3
      • 2018 IJRSLL – Vol. 7 Issue 4
    • 2019
      • 2019 IJRSLL – Vol. 8 Issue 1
      • 2019 IJRSLL – Vol. 8 Issue 2
  • IJRSC
    • 2012
      • 2012 IJRSC – Vol. 1 Issue 1
      • 2012 IJRSC – Vol. 1 Issue 2
    • 2013
      • 2013 IJRSC – Vol. 2 Issue 1
      • 2013 IJRSC – Vol. 2 Issue 2
    • 2014
      • 2014 IJRSC – Vol. 3 Issue 1
    • 2015
      • 2015 IJRSC – Vol. 4 Issue 1
      • 2015 IJRSC – Vol. 4 Issue 2
    • 2016
      • 2016 IJRSC – Vol. 5 Issue 1
      • 2016 IJRSC – Vol. 5 Issue 2
    • 2017
      • 2017 IJRSC – Vol. 6 Issue 1
  • IJRSM
    • 2012
      • 2012 IJRSM – Vol. 1 Issue 1
      • 2012 IJRSM – Vol. 1 Issue 2
    • 2013
      • 2013 IJRSM – Vol. 2 Issue 1
      • 2013 IJRSM – Vol. 2 Issue 2
    • 2014
      • 2014 IJRSM – Vol. 3 Issue 1
      • 2014 IJRSM – Vol. 3 Issue 2
    • 2015
      • 2015 IJRSM – Vol. 4 Issue 1
      • 2015 IJRSM – Vo. 4 Issue 2
    • 2016
      • 2016 IJRSM – Vol. 5 Issue 1
      • 2016 IJRSM – Vol. 5 Issue 2
    • 2017
      • 2017 IJRSM – Vol. 6 Issue 1
      • 2017 IJRSM – Vol. 6 Issue 2
    • 2018
      • 2018 IJRSM – Vol. 7 Issue 1
      • 2018 IJRSM – Vol. 7 Issue 2
    • 2019
      • 2019 IJRSM – Vol. 8 Issue 1
      • 2019 IJRSM – Vol. 8 Issue 2
    • 2021
      • 2021 IJRSM – Vol. 9 Issue 1
      • 2021 IJRSM – Vol. 9 Issue 2
      • 2021 IJRSM – Vol. 9 Issue 3
      • 2021 IJRSM – Vol. 9 Issue 4
    • 2022
      • 2022 IJRSM – Vol.10 Issue 1
      • 2022 IJRSM – Vol.10 Issue 2
      • 2022 IJRSM – Vol.10 Issue 3
      • 2022 IJRSM – Vol.10 Issue 4
      • 2022 IJRSM – Vol.10 Issue 5
    • 2023
      • 2023 IJRSM – Vol.11 Issue 1
  • IJRSP
    • 2012
      • 2012 IJRSP – Vol. 1 Issue 1
      • 2012 IJRSP – Vol. 1 Issue 2
      • 2012 IJRSP – Vol. 1 Issue 3
    • 2013
      • 2013 IJRSP – Vol. 2 Issue 1
      • 2013 IJRSP – Vol. 2 Issue 2
      • 2013 IJRSP – Vol. 2 Issue 3
      • 2013 IJRSP – Vol. 2 Issue 4
    • 2014
      • 2014 IJRSP – Vol. 3 Issue 1
      • 2014 IJRSP – Vol. 3 Issue 2
      • 2014 IJRSP – Vol. 3 Issue 3
      • 2014 IJRSP – Vol. 3 Issue 4
      • 2014 IJRSP – Vol. 3 Issue 5
    • 2015
      • 2015 IJRSP – Vol. 4 Issue 1
      • 2015 IJRSP – Vol. 4 Issue 2
      • 2015 IJRSP – Vol. 4 Issue 3
      • 2015 IJRSP – Vol. 4 Issue 4
    • 2016
      • 2016 IJRSP – Vol. 5 Issue 1
      • 2016 IJRSP – Vol. 5 Issue 2
      • 2016 IJRSP – Vol. 5 Issue 3
      • 2016 IJRSP – Vol. 5 Issue 4
    • 2017
      • 2017 IJRSP – Vol. 6 Issue 1
      • 2017 IJRSP – Vol. 6 Issue 2
    • 2018
      • 2018 IJRSP – Vol. 7 Issue 1
      • 2018 IJRSP – Vol. 7 Issue 2
    • 2019
      • 2019 IJRSP – Vol. 8 Issue 1
      • 2019 IJRSP – Vol. 8 Issue 2
  • Contact

Corrective feedback preferences among Iranian EFL students

2016 IJRSLL – Volume 5 Issue 2

Author/s:

Yousefi, Valiollah*
Department of English Language, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Iran (Yousefi1234@gmail.com)

Abstract:

The present study investigates the patterns of corrective feedback and negotiated feedback present in senior-level adult ESL classrooms. To this end, a topic was presented for discussion and everyone was permitted to express their own viewpoints. The data were collected through actual classroom observations (audio-taped) and follow-up interviews. The findings of this study showed that based on classroom observations and transcribing the data, the most frequent type of corrective feedback was ‘clarification request’, which comprises 8 (32%) feedbacks out of 25 and the least frequent feedback was ‘explicit correction’ receiving no consideration. Finally, follow-up interviews with students demonstrate that there is conformity between their preferences and the actual classroom feedback given.

Keywords: feedback; corrective feedback; oral feedback; clarification request; explicit correction

PDF

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsll.2015.1101

*Corresponding Author

Supported by:

Consortia Academia Group of Journals and NPRE, Philippines

Search

Proudly powered by WordPress