Skip to content

Consortia Academia

Group of Journals: A partner of Network of Professional Researchers and Educators (NPRE)

  • Home
  • About
    • Abstracting/Indexing
    • Editorial Team
    • Filipino-Language Scholarly Publication Policy
    • Peer Review Process
    • Publication Ethics and Research Integrity policies
    • Publication Frequency
    • Open Access Policy
    • Copyright Notice
    • Privacy Statement
    • Disclaimer
    • Contact
  • Submissions
    • Submission Process
    • Author Guidelines
    • Research Ethics, Author Declarations, and Data Availability Requirements
    • Review Guidelines
    • Publication Fees, Waivers, and Financial Support Policy
  • IJRSE
    • 2012
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2015
    • 2016
    • 2017
    • 2018
    • 2019
    • 2020
    • 2021
    • 2022
    • 2023
    • 2024
    • 2025
    • 2026
  • IJRSET
    • 2012
    • 2013
    • 2014
    • 2015
    • 2016
    • 2017
    • 2018
    • 2024
    • 2025
    • 2026
  • IJRSLL
    • 2012
    • 2013
    • 2014
    • 2015
    • 2016
    • 2017
    • 2018
    • 2019
    • 2023
    • 2024
  • IJRSC
    • 2012
    • 2013
    • 2014
    • 2015
    • 2016
    • 2017
  • IJRSM
    • 2012
    • 2013
    • 2014
    • 2015
    • 2016
    • 2017
    • 2018
    • 2019
    • 2021
    • 2022
    • 2023
    • 2024
    • 2025
    • 2026
  • IJRSP
    • 2012
    • 2013
    • 2014
    • 2015
    • 2016
    • 2017
    • 2018
    • 2019
    • 2023
    • 2024
    • 2025
    • 2026

Corrective feedback preferences among Iranian EFL students

2016 IJRSLL – Volume 5 Issue 2

Author/s:

Yousefi, Valiollah*
Department of English Language, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Iran (Yousefi1234@gmail.com)

Abstract:

The present study investigates the patterns of corrective feedback and negotiated feedback present in senior-level adult ESL classrooms. To this end, a topic was presented for discussion and everyone was permitted to express their own viewpoints. The data were collected through actual classroom observations (audio-taped) and follow-up interviews. The findings of this study showed that based on classroom observations and transcribing the data, the most frequent type of corrective feedback was ‘clarification request’, which comprises 8 (32%) feedbacks out of 25 and the least frequent feedback was ‘explicit correction’ receiving no consideration. Finally, follow-up interviews with students demonstrate that there is conformity between their preferences and the actual classroom feedback given.

Keywords: feedback; corrective feedback; oral feedback; clarification request; explicit correction

PDF

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsll.2015.1101

*Corresponding Author

Supported by:

Consortia Academia Group of Journals and NPRE, Philippines

Search

Proudly powered by WordPress